by beauzeau » Sat Jan 12, 2008 12:49 pm
DOH! MAAAAAN! I just reinstalled EVERYTHING on my computer tryin to get rid of an annoying little pop I was hearing. Yesterday, I logged on to rifflink and was able to jam for the first time in like two months. I had cleared my weekend for nothing but riffs. Oh well, guess I'll have to play with myself all weekend.
So does this mean the end of "beta" for rifflink (a year and 4 months in the making)? Sure will be interesting to see what's been in the works. And since NAMM is right around the corner, I hope for your sake that it's working and the switchover this weekend goes smoothly.
I CAN say that it's been nice not having to anticipate something this time around. It really sucked last time with the whole "end of first quarter 2006" thing. What made it so bad wasn't the waiting and waiting and waiting. What made it so bad was that we KNEW we were waiting, for something that promised to be really great (and it is). Thank you guys for not doing that to us again this time around. As it stands now, I only have to pull my hair out with anticipation for a few days while I ponder what you guys have added to an already stellar program!
Will we all get to hear everyone's drums? I remember someone telling me about a plan (tentative of course) to implement some sort of tiered thing whereby free members could hear but not change the drums, and paid members could hear and change the drums, or something like that. That does sound like a decent plan, but to me, ANYTHING that would allow everyone to at least HEAR the drums as arranged by the song author will be a welcome change.
Will the song author have the ability to lock the song bar somehow? I agree that "collaboration" means each contributor gets control. But also agree that each contributor shouldn't have ALL control if the author so desires. Ideally, I think there should be at least three levels of "control". Author, which has complete control, Artist, which is able to add layers to any existing riff (but not change anything about the song), and engineer, which would be a level similar to Author that is bestowed upon any artist by the song author. Of course, the song author could always opt to "override author control" and allow anyone to do anything they want to the song (kinda like it is now).
Another improvement, would be some way to limit the number of layers each artist gets on a particular riff. Yeah, I know, this is a touchy subject. Why stifle creativity huh? Well, not everyone realizes that if they leave 23 muted takes on a single riff, those takes STILL have to download every time someone opens the song, even though they aren't be used. Not everyone knows that you should delete all the other takes that you don't want to use. If it's not a keeper, it's not a keeper, and in the interest of keeping the song file as small as possible, takes that aren't needed, need to be deleted somehow, without relying on the original creator to do so. OR, there could be a limit, like 6 layers on a particular riff by a particular contributor. I can't imagine anyone needing more than six layers on a particular riff. Again, giving the author control over this would be great. When you create the song, there would be a little box where you can type in how many layers each contributor is allowed per riff.
What improvements, if any, have been made in regards to the UI? Are there more intuitive chat features for instance? (that one line of text per msg gets old quick, especially to verbose old farts like me). One thing I always thought would be nice is a talkback button so that we could opt to listen in on a dedicated talkback channel for any particular song.
Well, if any of you know what they're cooking up (beta testers,etc) feel free to chime in and let me know. I haven't been rifflinking over the last few months. Now that the slow season is upon me, I'm ready to once again spend some time jammin with the junkies. It's a bonus if Rifflink is getting a revamp!
Last edited by
beauzeau on Sat Jan 12, 2008 5:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"I think the problem might have been, that there was a stonehenge monument on stage in danger of being crushed, by a dwarf". "I really think you're making a big thing out of this". "Making a big thing out of it would have been a good idea".