BTW to the mac user.. If macs ever mange to take over as the mainstream pc then safari and any other MAIN browser will be a victim of the same exploits.. I have VMware on my server with 10 different Operating systems and actually the most secure is Solaris 10, next is Ubantu..infact mac OSX 10.5.** AKA hackintosh is the second least secure but then again it is the second most used OS in the world.. Well actually third if you consider PDA media.. All this is changeing as now macs have also switched to intell processors...nice.. Soon there will be so many OS that none will be really any safer than the other.. Actually it is already that way.
I understand all of this (trust me, I'm an IT guy and have been for many years)

For now I'm quite happy that OSX is not a target. One of the things that you fail to mention is the fact that things like "net tools" are easily available for hackers (or wannabe's or script kiddies or whoever) to download and that is the thing that makes windows such an appealing target. There are a bevy of freely available hacker/hacking/trojan/virus tools out there so most of the hard work is already done for those that want to take advantage of the fact.
As for overall security, while OSX is not perfect I feel very strongly that it is safer than windows. At least all of the low levels of the code (Darwin) are freely available for the geeks that care about that sort of thing to audit as they feel fit -- and luckily most of the users I've ever known that have the knowhow or desire to take things this far would be much happier sending in a patch to fix the problem than writing an exploit to take advantage of it -- but as you say, that's for now. Before OSX I was an avid Linux user (and developer for several years) -- the same thing holds true for most Linux distros as I mentioned above. Having your source "open" affords a HUGE team of bug testers/repair guys/emergency response folk at hand

Lastly for all the comments on the grainy fonts, they are all anti-aliased and if you're an IE user you're just not used to seeing them like that. I prefer anti-aliased fonts for screen viewing, but each to their own. Windows doesn't do a particularly good job of it a lot of the time, which is why it looks poor
