BuleriaChk wrote:Rifftracks is a white elephant for those interested in real music (hey, I haven't even mentioned 7/8 or 9/8 or 5/4 time signatures - common throughout the world.) And I wouldn't have an objection if RiffTracker provided either a wav or midi option....
But without it we are limited to YOUR rhythmic tastes, not ours. And in my experience a jazz 6/8 (often confused with 2/4 tripets) isn't the same as a Flamenco 6/8 (which is contrasted with 3/4; being different accentuations of six 1/8th notes)
Well you can defend all you want to, I'm not going to attack any longer. I just think your program is for musical kindergarten, and isn't even a good educational tool without those features....
Sheesh - even Gearbox will loop .wav files.....
I see. Because it doesn't support the music you like - it's useless. I beg to differ.
The music I enjoy and write is real music, my friend. Perhaps not to your taste - but real music all the same. I love guitar music of all kinds - period. Blues, jazz, pop, prog, metal, rock, classical, neo-classical, indie, emo, hardcore, flamenco - you name it, I love it all.
Your assertion that my musical taste is in some way lesser to yours only highlights your own inability to recognise that music comes in many, many flavours. Some we find instantly enjoyable, others takes time to resonate and some are particularly challenging to listen to and appreciate. But this doesn't dimish their overall worth.
All software is written with the majority in mind - not the minority. It's simple economics. Why develop a program which will appeal to only a small, select few? How would the developers re-coup their costs? Sonoma is still in it's infancy and so is the RiffWorks software and there is still a lot more to come from these guys.
The WAV importing subject has been a topic on these boards for many, many months and Sonoma are well aware that a number of users would love this functionality. These guys LISTEN, believe me. This or something similar will, no doubt, be incorporated into a future version of the software as the scope of RiffWorks is increased.
The fact remains, however, that the design ethic behind the software was to simplify the recording process and help remove the barriers between the guitarist having an idea and turning that idea into a reality. There are already tons (ProTools, Logic etc.) of applications on the market that will do exactly what you need, without a doubt, so perhaps that is where you should focus your attention. RiffWorks is aimed at an entirely different market that's not fixated on complexity. I like to think of it as Pro-level sound without Pro-level complications. The interface, when it's designed well, should become so intuitive it's almost invisible to the user. I think RiffWorks has achieved that from day one. It's most certainly not "Kindergarten" level.
Have you listened to RiffCaster? Have you heard what people are doing with this software every day? One listen to the imaginative, creative and inspirational things that people are doing with RiffWorks would blow your "Kindergarten" arguement to bits.
There are loads of users on these forums who feel the way I do and I'm sure they'll post on this subject.
I also use Logic Express 7 and GarageBand 3 to record my music, so I'm no Sonoma whore. I just feel that it's one of the only packages on the market that has been designed for the guitar player from the ground up. I'm truly appreciative of their efforts to democratise computer recording, making it accessible to everybody, no matter what their technical or creative abililty is.
EDIT: To correct spelling errors.
Cheers,
Al